Archive for September 2015


September 27, 2015

I believe the Ambassador of People’s Republic of China had crossed certain RED DIPLOMATIC LINE by making controversial statements to traders of Petaling Street yesterday.

Let me tell Dr Huang Hui Kang, that TWO WRONGS DO NOT MAKE IT RIGHT.

It was wrong for the RED SHIRTS to organize street demonstration which will disrupt businesses, be it in Petaling Street or any where else…in the same way, it was wrong for Bersih4.0 to organize street demonstration which disrupted businesses along Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman and the vicinity of Dataran Merdeka.

In what way Dr Huang Hui Kang was WRONG?

Dr Kang should have not acted as if he is a Governor of Malaysia…representing the People’s Republic of China. Malaysia has never been and will never be one of the provinces of China. Malaysia is a sovereign country. Dr Kang may have been a bit TOO ARROGANT, and may have breached certain diplomatic protocols.

Regardless whether the RED SHIRTS were right or wrong, its definitely WRONG for Dr Kang to give veiled warning to any party in this sovereign country. Its a gross violation of diplomatic norms in CIVILISED WORLD.

What would be the reaction of the Government of the People’s Republic of China, had another superpower, be it America or Russia, sent their ambassadors to the troubled Xin Kiang province of north east China, and warned certain group of Hui Chinese there not to discriminate against the minority Uigurs? Even if the Hui Chinese were in the wrong, Chinese Government would be very unhappy with such actions by an ambassador of another country.

I think our Malaysian Government should at least send a strong diplomatic protest against the ‘misendavour’ of Dr Kang. If our Government thinks fit, the Chinese ambassador should be sent back to China.


How Many % of Petaling Street Traders Are CHINESE NATIONALS?

September 26, 2015

Let me be clear from the very beginning, that I’m against any form of violence or racism, either by pro-opposition elements or pro-government elements of our country’s political divide. I’m personally against any rally that would disrupt businesses, either by the RED SHIRTS in Petaling Street, or by Bersih4.0 in the vicinity of Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman and Dataran Merdeka.

However, an event of yesterday have baffled many, especially its implication on future race relation, in particular Malays-Chinese relation in this country. As reported yesterday, the Chinese ambassador to Malaysia, Dr Huang Hui Kang, was in Petaling Street yesterday, in anticipation of another smaller RED SHIRTS rally speculated to take place today in the ‘Chinatown’ of Kuala Lumpur.

The Chinese ambassador’s presence was not only to distribute mooncakes to the traders, but he was reported to told the traders, ‘We told businesspeople here that they can open as usual tomorrow if they want, but if they feel unsafe, the choice is theirs to close instead’. He was also reported to have said, ‘….nobody is above the law. So reject racism and any form of extremism.’ He was even quoted to have ‘warned’ the rally organizers that the Government of China would not want to see acts of violence been perpetrated by anyone.

What puzzled many is, what was the main reason for an Ambassador of a foreign country, People’s Republic of China, doing in Petaling Street? An initial impression is, Dr Kang appeared to have committed serious breach of diplomatic norms between two sovereign countries. After all, the Malaysian police had proven their impartiality in maintaining law and order, and protecting the traders in 916 rally. Then, none of the traders was hurt, and none of their premises was either looted or burnt.

The only justifiable reason for Dr Kang to be there there…giving out advices and warnings too…was, IF there are sizeable number of CHINESE NATIONALS doing business in Petaling Street, and their lives and businesses are under imminent danger. Even in such situation, Dr Kang must still register their concerns with our Foreign Ministry through proper diplomatic channels.

If that’s really the case, its interesting to know how many percent of traders in Petaling Street are CHINESE NATIONALS.

IF the presence of CHINESE NATIONALS are negligible…or none at all…then on what basis he was there giving those ‘sermons’? Is it because the traders are mainly from ethnic Chinese, Malaysian Chinese. If that was the case, can we say that it was a kind of RACISM which had driven Dr Kang to openly interfere in the internal affairs of a sovereign country, Malaysia?

Malaysians Prefer No Street Demonstration

September 25, 2015

I find myself in agreement with MCA’s President, that the Government should not allow any street demonstrations in future.

As events unfolded in the last few weeks, street demonstrations by Bersih4.0 was countered by another demonstrations by the RED SHIRTS two weeks later. And as we had all witnessed, how certain ‘side-shows’ like certain young Chinese girls stamping their feet on photos of Malay leaders during Bersih4.0 had triggered so much anger and revenge among the Malays.

If we care to take a leaf from our nation’s history, not many will dispute that the ‘victory parades’ by DAP in the middle of KL immediately after the general election in 1969 was responsible to spark off counter demonstrations which triggered the worst racial riot our country had ever experienced.

Many countries can still prosper without street demonstrations. Just listen how our Malaysian Chinese friends talk proudly about the achievements of China, Hong Kong and Singapore. Even Bersih4.0 was not allowed in either Singapore and China. And…there are over 95% ethnic Chinese in both China and Hong Kong…and over 85% ethnic Chinese in Singapore.

If countries like China, Hong Kong and Singapore can prosper without street demonstrations, why DAP Chinese are so keen on street demonstration in this country…their country too..when such activities may trigger racial unrest and conflicts.

Really agree with MCA….STOP ALL STREET DEMOS IN FUTURE….lets be fair to all.

KETUANAN MELAYU Here To Stay, Like It or Not

September 25, 2015

Before we discus ‘Ketuanan Melayu’, lets see how Malays understand the term ‘Ketuanan Melayu’…rather than how DAP understands it.

To the Malays, ‘Ketuanan Melayu’ is not about the Malays being a master race and the others as slave races.

To the Malays, ‘Ketuanan Melayu’ also does not imply Malay dominance as claimed by certain non-Malays.

To the Malays, ‘Ketuanan Melayu’ means that the Malays are accorded certain ‘Special position…’ in the Federal Constitution for being the ‘original owner and ruler’ of Tanah Melayu and Persekutuan Tanah Melayu.

Malays never claim that they are master race over other races. The Malays never claim that they should ‘dominate’ all spheres of life in the country….after all the Chinese are the dominant race, in general, in the field of economy.

However, Malays only demand RECOGNITION by other races that their forefathers were the ‘original owners and rulers’ of this part of the world known as the Malay Archipelago, in particular the peninsula part of Malaysia, known as Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, or Malaya.

Actually such RECOGNITION was already ‘inscribed’ in the Federal Constitution by inclusion of various articles which are MALAY-CENTRED, like the ‘special position…’ accorded to the Malays and Bumiputra of Sabah and Sarawak. Besides that, the adoption of Islam(the religion of the Malays in Malaysia) as the RELIGION OF THE FEDERATION, the adoption of Bahasa Melayu(the language of the Malays) as the official language of the country, the role of one of the Malays Raja Melayu as one of the Agung(king) of the country, the provision of ‘tanah rizab Melayu’ and such like.

Whether DAP Chinese like it or not, such understanding of ‘Ketuanan Melayu’ is wide spread within the Malay community, and they will never surrender such status accorded to them in the formulation of the Federal Constitution.

Let me remind. Ketuanan Melayu is NEITHER about the Malays being a master race NOR the Malays as dominant race. Ketuanan Melayu is a general recognition that the forefathers of the Malays were the original owners and rulers of Tanah Melayu….as being inscribed in our Federal Constitution.

Datuk Jamal – New Malay LEADER Born Out of Bersih4.0

September 25, 2015

Not many people know Datuk Jamal  Md Yunos, before Bersih4.0 on 29-30th August 2015. Although he has been the Sungai Besar division leader for quite some time, his name never surfaced. His name and face only surfaced in social media and newspapers in the run up to recent Bersih4.0 demonstration.

Not many will dispute that the RED SHIRTS rally was not initiated by UMNO. Instead, it was started by a number of Malay NGOs. Not many also will dispute that certain credit should accorded to Datuk Jamal for his role as the ‘de facto’ co-ordinator of RED SHIRTS rally. Without his ‘leading by example’ role, its very unlikely that DS Ali Rustam, TS Anuar Musa or DS Noh Omar would be able to attract such a huge participation in RED SHIRTS.

Its not difficult to understand why demos like Bersih4.0 gave rise to Malay leaders like Datuk Jamal. Its no secret that the ‘de facto’ organiser of Bersih4.0 was the Chinese-centred DAP. Since their debut in Malaysian general election in 1969, DAP has been drumming their ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ struggle. ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ as a slogan may look like a fair objective…but, its SERIOUSLY opposed to the spirit of the ‘Malay-centred’ Federal Constitution.

Bersih4.0 was no longer about fair election. Had our general elections been unfair, how could opposition parties managed to win in Selangor, Penang and Kelantan? Whats the main objective of Bersih4.0 then? Its none other than to call for resignation of DS Najib, as the Prime Minister of the country.

The RED SHIRTS rally’s main objective was the opposite of what Bersih4.0. RED SHIRTS would like to show to the rest of Malaysians and the whole world that DS Najib commands the support of the Malays….as opposed to the demands and wishes of the DAP Chinese.

Leadership and single-mindedness of Datuk Jamal was very crucial in successful planning and execution of RED SHIRTS rally. He has earned RECOGNITION as one of OUTSTANDING Malay new leaders…thanks to Bersih4.0.

Who Are the Actual RACISTS – Discourse on Chinese Vernacular Schools

September 21, 2015

There are certain TABOOS in Malaysian Politics. In Bahasa Malaysia, TABOOS is interpreted as ‘pantang larang’, laterally means ‘forbidden’.

One of the taboos is to question ‘kedudukan istimewa Melayu/Bumiputra’ or ‘special position of Malays/Bumiputras’ as provided for in Article 153 of our Federal Constitution. This article was incorporated in the Federal Constitution based on ‘Citizenship Agreement’ between the immigrant forefathers of Malaysian Chinese and Malaysian Indians of today, with the forefathers of the indigenous Malays in early 1950s…a few years before the independence of Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, the peninsula part of present day Malaysia.

Another prominent TABOO is to question the existence of Chinese Vernacular Schools, better known as Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina or SJKC. SJKC are actually private schools set up by Chinese communities, with certain degree of funding by the Federal Government. In SJKC, the medium of teaching/learning is Chinese/Mandarin. Despite being privately funded, most SJKC are MORE LUXURIOUS than Government fully-funded Sekolah Kebangsaan(SK) or National Schools, which are open to all Malaysian children…but with Bahasa Melayu, the national language of the country,  as the medium of teaching/learning. For example, most SJKC class-rooms are fully air-conditioned, compared to SK which can only afford ‘natural ventilation.

Based on latest statictics, about 90% of Chinese children are sent to SJKC. Meaning only 10% of Chinese children are sent to Government-funded SK.

Since the debut of DAP in the country’s General Elections in 1969, DAP Chinese have increasingly question the the TABOO to the Malays…their ‘special position…’ in the Federal Constitution. In fact, co-incidently, the 1969 May Tragedy, erupted in Kuala Lumpur after days of ‘victory parades’ by DAP supporters, for their ‘victory’ in denying the Alliance Party a two-third majority win in Parliment for the first time.

Paradoxically, when certain Malay-based political parties and NGOs, stood up in defense of Article 153 and its instruments of implementation, like the Dasar Ekonomi Baru(DEB), which are clearly provided for in the Federal Constitution, DAP would be the first to label such party or NGO as RACISTS. Perkasa and ISMA are two of Malay-based NGOs who have been labelled as RACISTS for their brave stands to uphold the Article of the Federal Constitution.

On the other hand, SJKC are not even mentioned in the Federal Constitution. The Federal Constitution only provide for the TEACHING OF MOTHER LANGUAGES among the children of various non-Malays races and ethnic groups. Last week, when certain participants of RED SHIRTS rally displayed a few banners calling for abolishing of SJKC, all Chinese-based political parties were quick to jump on their two feet to label the rally as RACISTS.

There appears to be serious DOUBLE STANDARD being practised by the Chinese and their Chinese-based political parties and NGOs. The Malays who are calling for abolishment of SJKC are looking it from the point of view of bringing all Malaysian children in single NATIONAL SCHOOLS, rather than segregating them into three or more types of schools…with different languages of teaching/learning, believe that, such segregation has been the primary cause of RACIAL MISUNDERSTANDING among the childeren when they grow up. But, to the Chinese, the Malays or Malay-based parties who support such ideas are RACISTS.

The way I see it, our fellow Malaysian citizens, Malaysian Chinese, are the ones who are looking at things ‘CHINESE FIRST and MALAYSIA SECOND’ when they so fanatically defending the SJKC….so fanatically rejecting any idea of streamlining our Malaysian children into single Malay-medium National Schools. By thinking ‘CHINESE FIRST and MALAYSIAN SECOND’ with regards to education, Malaysian Chinese are definitely the actual RACISTS.

UMNO Got Dignity. PKR No Dignity. DAP No Dignity.

September 20, 2015

UMNO has been consistent in defending the rights of Malays from its inception in 1946. UMNO and Raja Melayu fought against the Malayan Union(without any support from the Chinese and Indians) which led to establishment of Persekutuan Tanah Melayu in 1948. Along the way MCA and MIC joined in. UMNO was at the forefront of formulation of the Constitution of Persekutuan Tanah Melayu which was Malay-centred, ie. Islam, the religion of the Malays became the ‘religion of the Federation’, Bahasa Melayu, the language of the Malays became ‘bahasa rasmi’, the Raja-Raja Melayu select the Agung among themselves to be the king of the country, giving ‘special position’ to the Malays etc etc. Until now, UMNO are upholding those provisions ‘without fear or favour’. In this sense, UMNO GOT DIGNITY.

PKR, despite being led generally by Malays are not defending the Malay rights as allowed for in the Constitution. Prior to PRU 2008, PKR even promised the Chinese voters to do away with DEB, one of the intruments of implementation of Article 153 of the Federal Constitution. No doubt, PKR got votes from the Chinese by being TRAITORS to their own Malay race….and TRAITORS to the Federal Constitution too. And latest, despite PAS refusal to work with both DAP and Amanah, PKR is still ‘nagging’ PAS to work within Pakatan2.0….mainly to ensure that the Selangor Government does not fall to the BN. For the sake of retaining some power, PKR is willing to do ‘hidung tak mancung, pipi tersorong-sorong’. In this sense, PKR has NO DIGNITY.

DAP is worst of all. They knew from day one that PAS’s aspirations included implementation of HUDUD LAWS. For the sake of Malay votes, DAP was willing to pretend that PAS had shelved those HUDUD LAWS. Even after the parties ‘divorced each other’, DAP is still willing to sleep on the same bed as PAS…in Selangor…for the most ridiculous of excuses. On top of that, DAP is not bold enough to insist PAS to make a choice….DAP/Amanah  or PAS. Apparently, Lim Kit Siang and Lim Guan Eng are just like TIN KOSONG. TIN KOSONG makes loudest of noises, compares to tins full of oil or biscuits. Obviously, all the cocky and arrogant talks by the Lim the Father and Lim the Son are just to hide their hollow core. DAP indirectly still need to hang on to PAS…hence their unwillingness to give ‘kata dua’ to PKR. In this sense, DAP also has NO DIGNITY.

%d bloggers like this: