Posted tagged ‘Malaysian Malaysia’

RED SHIRTS – HYPOCRISY of Lim Kit Siang

September 10, 2015

For Lim Kit Siang, 1Malaysia concept is a failure, when a group of Malay NGOs are organising a massive gathering of Malays in the vicinity of Bukit Bintang on 16th September. The gathering to be called ‘Perhimpunan Maruah Melayu’, literally means ‘Malay Dignity Gathering’.

For Lim Kit Siang, he would prefer other terms like ‘Perhimpunan Maruah Malaysia’, or ‘Malaysian Dignity Gathering.

Lim Kit Siang would like to pretend that ‘race’ is not in his mind. He would like to project himself as a ‘Malaysian leader’, ‘a Malaysian politician’, and a leader of a multi-racial party….the DAP.

In contrast, when it comes to the issue of schools, DAP is at the forefront in defending the Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina(SJKC)….Chinese schools,  where the the medium of instruction is in Chinese.

Just imagine, from the age of 6-12 years old, our children are sent to different types of schools. Most of Malay children are sent to National Schools(Sekolah Kebangsaan)…which are meant for all Malaysian children.

Unfortunately, an overwhelming majority of Chinese prefer to send their children to Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina. Such preference is cultivated, promoted and supported by all Chinese-based political parties….including Lim Kit Siang’s DAP.

Why, when it comes to schools, Lim Kit Siang will choose ‘Chinese First…Malaysian Second’.

What the fook is DAP’s ‘Malaysian Malaysia’? What can you say Mr BIGGEST HYPOCRITE?

New MCA Leaders Have To Return to the Ways of MCA Founders

December 22, 2013

Congratulation to DS Liow Tiong Lai, and Dato’ Wee Ka Siong, who have been elected President and Deputy President of MCA. The same greetings also for those elected Vice Presidents and CEC members.

They are facing HUGE TASKS, almost UPHILL TASKS, to get back the support of the majority of the Chinese community, who have been overwhelmingly with DAP, since the 2008 GE. DAP was set up with objectives, among others, of DEMOLISHING certain fundamental corner-stones of our Federal Constitution, namely the provision of SPECIAL POSITION OF MALAYS/BUMIPUTRAS.

Whilst, MCA was one of the major players in the formulation of the SOCIAL CONTRACT among the major races, agreed upon a few years before the independence of Persekutuan Tanah Melayu. Under the SOCIAL CONTRACT, the Malay rulers and UMNO(the umbrella party of Malays), agreed to the persuasion of the British, to allow about 1.2 million CHINESE IMMIGRANTS, and 0.3 million INDIAN IMMIGRANTS, to be granted citizenship of Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, and in return, those who were granted citizenship would recognize the SPECIAL POSITION of the Malays/bumiputras, who were original rulers and inhabitants of the Malay states.

Obviously, MCA and DAP were founded on DIFFERENT SETS OF OBJECTIVES. However, DAP appeared to have been able to gain the upper hands in IGNITING the feelings of the Chinese community, by their ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ objectives, ie. to do away with the provisions in our Federal Constitution, which provide for the SPECIAL POSITION of the Malays/Bumiputras, and all policies associated with it.

MCA should never try to be MORE DAP than DAP. MCA has to go back to the history of the party, as well as the history of the country’s independence. Founders of the Alliance Party(consisting of UMNO, MCA and MIC) were very far-sighted in formulating the Constitution of Persekutuan Tanah Melayu. Political stability of this country has been a key factor in the SUCCESS STORY of the country, including OUTSTANDING SUCCESS of its Chinese business community. Malaysia is now TOP 20 BIGGEST TRADING NATION in the world, and the country is on the verge of becoming a DEVELOPED COUNTRY.

Newly elected MCA leaders have a great task, to bring back MCA to the ways and thoughts of the MCA founders, most of whom were born in China, and immigrated to the Malay states during the ‘protectorate’ of the British in the Malay states. They were among those who were gifted with foresightedness, who formulated the SOCIAL CONTRACT, to ensure lasting PEACE, STABILITY and PROSPERITY of Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, the permanent abode of their children and descendants for thousands of years to come.

To win back the Chinese, MCA has to re-educate the Chinese community, the WIN-WIN formula agreed upon by the co-founders of the country. MCA has to work hard to convince the Chinese community that the BN formula is THE WIN-WIN formula, and this the only way forward…..and that the DAP ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ will only lead to DESTRUCTION of what the country has built over the years.

Kenapa ‘Undi Popular’ Hanyalah KHAYALAN NAKAL Anwar Ibrahim dan Lim Kit Siang?

May 13, 2013

Aku sampai dah naik ‘kesian’ dengan parti-parti pembangkang di Malaysia. Selesai sahaja satu PRU, mereka tidak ‘membuang masa’ untuk terus memulakan kerja-kerja persiapan bagi PRU berikutnya. Setiap kali PRU menjelang tiba, jentera ‘psy-war’ pembangkang akan mula menggembar-gempurkan bahawa Kerajaan BN akan jatuh….Tetapi, setiap kali keputusan PRU diumumkan, BN terus menjadi pemenang. PRU13 sekali lagi menyaksikan angan-angan Anwar Ibrahim dan Lim Kit Siang hancur berkecai. Bagi ‘mencacatkan’ kejayaan besar BN, mereka buat pertama kali telah buka cerita tentang ‘undi popular’.

Sebenarnya perhitungan ‘undi popular’ lansung TIDAK RELEVAN di dalam sistem demokrasi di Malaysia, yang telah dimodelkan dari sistem demokrasi Westminster di United Kingdom. Apa yang menjadi kriteria kemenangan/kekalahan di dalam sistem pilihanraya  ‘Westminster’ ini ialah berdasarkan berapa jumlah kerusi parlimen atau dewan undangan negeri yang dimenangi oleh parti-parti yang bertanding. Di dalam PRU13 baru-baru ini, BN telah memenangi 133 kerusi parlimen, berbanding dengan 89 sahaja untuk parti-parti pembangkang….dengan itu BN telah diisytihar pemenang.

Tidak dapat dinafikan, perhitungan ‘undi popular’ boleh mencacatkan sedikit kemenangan BN. Namun begitu, ia tidak boleh sekali-kali dijadikan alasan untuk mempertikaikan kesahihan keputusan pilihanraya atau menuntut diadakan pilihanraya semula oleh mana-mana pihak. Apatah lagi di dalam konteks Malaysia di mana parti-parti pembangkang gagal untuk menubuhkan suatu gabungan yang rasmi dan sah berdaftar di bawak Akta Pertubuhan 1966. Malah nama ‘PAKATAN RAKYAT’ itu sendiri belum didaftarkan secara rasmi di ROS. Walhasil, parti-parti PKR, DAP dan PAS bertanding di bawah lambang-lambang  parti-parti mereka yang berasingan….malah di beberapa kawasan, parti-parti ini bertanding sesama mereka.

Rakyat Malaysia umumnya telah pintar ilmu mathematics. Kalau ditanya apa jumlah 1+1+1, semua akan jawab 3. Namun begitu, di bidang politik, ada masanya 1+1+1 jawapannya BUKAN 3. Sebagai contoh, di dalam PRU13 baru lalu, DAP menang 38 kerusi, PKR 30 dan PAS 21. Secara mathematik, 38+30+21 jumlahnya ialah 89. Tetapi, sekiranya DAP, PKR dan PAS bergabung secara rasmi di bawah satu PARTI GABUNGAN yang sah, dan bertanding menggunakan lambang yang satu, BELUM TENTU lagi gabungan sedemikian akan berjaya mendapat 89 kerusi.

Sebagaimana kita semua tahu, DAP berkempen di kawasan-kawasan majoriti Cina dengan membawa mesej MENGHAPUSKAN KEDUDUKAN ISTIMEWA MELAYU/BUMIPUTRA, selain dari menegakkan faham SEKULARISMA. PAS pula berkempen di kawasan majoriti Melayu dengan mesej MENEGAKKAN NEGARA ISLAM, termasuk HUDUD. PKR pula berkempen di kawasan-kawasan ‘mixed voters’ dengan mesej yang berlainan pula. Tetapi, sekiranya DAP, PAS dan PKR menggunakan mesej yang sama semasa berkempen, samada di kawasan majoriti Cina atau kawasan majoriti Melayu, belum tentu penerimaan pengundi terhadap mereka akan sama sepertimana yang mereka telah capai di PRU13.

Sebagai perbandingan, katakan DAP mengadakan majlis makan malam di mana SUP BABI dihidangkan, dan berjaya menarik minat 1,000 orang pengunjung Cina, sementara  PAS pula mengadakan majlis makan berasingan di mana AYAM PERCIK dihidangkan, dan menarik 1,000 orang hadirin Melayu. Tetapi, kalau DAP dan PAS bersama-sama menganjurkan makan malam di mana SUP BABI dan AYAM PERCIK dihidangkan di atas meja yang sama, aku yakin bahawa hanya beberapa kerat Melayu yang TAK SEDAR DIRI sahaja akan hadir. Di dalam kes seperti ini, 1,000+1,000 tidak akan memberi jawapan 2,000.

Di atas pertimbangan-pertimbangan sebagai di atas, Anwar Ibrahim dan Lim Kit Siang tidak wajar menggembar-gemburkan KHAYALAN NAKAL ‘undi popular’ selagi DAP, PKR dan PAS masih gagal untuk bergabung di bawah suatu parti gabungan yang berdaftar, dan bertanding menentang BN menggunakan lambang parti gabungan yang satu.

Hidup UMNO!!! Hidup BN!!! Hidup Najib!!!

DAP Sewajarnya Telah Lama DIHARAMKAN!!!!

April 20, 2013

Usaha berterusan DAP di dalam menyebarkan fahaman ‘Malaysian Malaysia’, dengan matlamat utama MENGHAPUSKAN KEDUDUKAN ISTIMEWA MELAYU,  telah dan akan terus menjadi ANCAMAN TERBESAR terhadap keamanan dan kestabilan negara. Walaupun dasar-dasar berpaksikan ‘Hak Istimewa Melayu/Bumiputra’ merupakan antara asas-asas utama penubuhan negara Persekutuan Tanah Melayu dan Malaysia, DAP terus menjadikannya sebagai modal politik untuk menanam kebencian terhadap UMNO/BN.

Aku kerap bertanya, apakah wajar sebuah parti politik seperti DAP, yang memperjuangkan matlamat-matlamat yang BERTENTANGAN dengan semangat dan kandungan Perlembagaan Persekutuan, dibenarkan bergerak sebagai sebuah pertubuhan berdaftar, malah dibenarkan bertanding di dalam PRU di Malaysia, dan mempengaruhi hala-tuju dan dasar-dasar negara Malaysia? Di dalam usaha mencari jawapan,  aku telah membuat kajian-kajian tentang Akta Pertubuhan 1966, dan telah mendapat sebahagian dari jawapan-jawapannya. Di antara yang menarik perhatian aku ialah Perkara 2A dengan tajuk: ‘PERTUBUHAN-PERTUBUHAN BERDAFTER HENDAKLAH BERGERAK MENGIKUT PERUNTUKAN PERLEMBAGAAN’.

Perkara 2A mencatatkan: ‘Adalah menjadi tanggung-jawab setiap pertubuhan berdaftar untuk menjalankan aktiviti-aktiviti dan urusan-urusannya, dengan menentukan bahawa aktiviti-aktiviti tersebut adalah bertepatan dengan, dan menyumbang ke arah memenuhi dan mematuhi, peruntukan-peruntukan Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan Perlembagaan Negeri-Negeri, dan jika terdapat apa-apa aktiviti atau urusan mana-mana pertubuhan yang melanggar, atau merendahkan, atau bertentangan dengan, atau tidak mempedulikan tentang…..kedudukan istimewa Melayu dan bumiputra Sabah dan Sarawak….sebagaimana diperuntukkan di dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan, Pendaftar Pertubuhan boleh MEMBATALKAN pendaftaran pertubuhan tersebut….’

Setelah mengkaji peruntukan-peruntukan di dalam Akta Pertubuhan 1966, tidak syak lagi bahawa DAP  telah begitu lama menjalankan kegiatan-kegiatan dan urusan-urusan yang boleh dianggap sebagai MELANGGAR, atau MERENDAHKAN, atau BERTENTANGAN DENGAN, atau TIDAK MEMPEDULIKAN, peruntukan-peruntukan Perlembagaan, khususnya berhubung HAK ISTIMEWA MELAYU/BUMIPUTRA. Malang bagi negara kita, keadaan ini telah dibiarkan berterusan sejak begitu lama sehingga telah bercambah dan berkembang POLITIK DENDAM DAN BENCI ke seluruh pelusuk negara.

Akta Pertubuhan 1966 amat jelas peruntukan-peruntukannya. Akta tersebut juga menetapkan SIAPAKAH YANG BERTANGGUNG-JAWAB untuk memantau segala kegiatan dan urusan pertubuhan-pertubuhan berdaftar, dan apakah tindakan-tindakan di bawah bidang kuasa mereka yang boleh dikuat-kuasakan, apabila ada pertubuhan-pertubuhan yang mana aspirasi, matlamat dan kegiatan mereka BERTENTANGAN dengan semangat dan kandungan Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

UNSUR MENIPULASI di dalam pemilihan Jawatankuasa Kerja Pusat(CEC) DAP baru-baru ini bagi aku hanya suatu KESALAHAN KECIL berbanding dengan DASAR-DASAR PERJUANGAN DAP yang bertentangan dengan semangat dan asas-asas Perlembagaan negara kita. Tanpa mengambil kira perkara-perkara berkaitan pemilihan CEC DAP, aku yakin dan percaya, DAP sepatutnya telah lama dibatalkan pendaftarannya…..

DAP Boleh Diharamkan Mengikut Akta Pertubuhan 1966 Kerana Menyebarkan Konsep ‘Malaysian Malaysia’

December 17, 2012

Konsep ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ telah mula diperkenalkan oleh People’s Action Party(PAP) Singapura pimpinan Lee Kuan Yew sebaik sahaja Singapura menjadi sebahagian dari Malaysia pada tahun 1963. Konsep ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ mengimpikan sebuah negara Malaysia di mana peruntukan ‘Hak Istimewa Melayu’ sebagaimana terdapat di dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan dihapuskan.

Kesungguhan PAP mengembangkan ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ telah ditentang hebat oleh parti United Malays National Organisation(UMNO) yang merupakan tulang belakang kepada parti Perikatan, yang turut dianggotai oleh Malaysian Chinese Association(MCA) dan Malaysian Indian Congress(MIC). Keadaan ini telah membawa kepada penyingkiran Singapura dari Malaysia. Tindakan ini dilihat sebagai suatu tindakan seperti ‘memotong’ sebahagian dari anggota badan seseorang yang berpenyakit kanser, bagi mengelakkan penyakit kanser tersebut dari merebak ke bahagian badan yang lain.

Namun begitu, penyingkiran Singapura dari Malaysia tidak dapat menyekat pemikiran ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ sebagaimana diasaskan oleh PAP dari terus diperjuangkan oleh bekas penyokong-penyokong PAP di Malaysia, yang kemudiannya telah menubuhkan parti Democratic Action Party(DAP), yang sekarang ini dipimpin oleh Lim Kit Siang sebagai Penasihat, anaknya Lim Guan Eng sebagai Setiausaha Agung, dan Karpal Singh sebagai Pengerusi. Kepimpinan ini masih kekal berkuasa di dalam DAP setelah selesai Konvensyen Tahunan DAP semalam.

DAP  mengambil bahagian buat kali pertama di dalam proses pilihanraya di Malaysia di dalam PRU 1969, di mana parti tersebut telah memberikan impact yang agak besar di kawasan-kawasan di mana terdapat peratusan besar pengundi-pengundi Cina. Secara kebetulannya, beberapa hari selepas PRU 1969 tersebut, negara kita menyaksikan tercetusnya rusuhan kaum yang paling dahsyat di dalam sejarah negara selepas kemerdekaan.

Usaha berterusan DAP di dalam menyebarkan fahaman ‘Malaysian Malaysia’  telah dan akan terus menjadi ANCAMAN TERBESAR terhadap keamanan dan kestabilan negara. Walaupun dasar-dasar berpaksikan ‘Hak Istimewa Melayu/Bumiputra’ merupakan antara asas-asas utama penubuhan negara Persekutuan Tanah Melayu dan Malaysia, DAP terus menjadikan peruntukan-peruntukan Perlembagaan tersebut sebagai modal politik untuk menanam kebencian terhadap UMNO, dan rakan-rakan UMNO di dalam parti Perikatan, dan Barisan Nasional(BN). Malah Lim Kit Siang sendiri telah menulis sebuah buku berjodol ‘Time Bomb’ yang meramalkan bahawa negara ini akan berhadapan suatu ‘letupan perkauman’. Amat menghairankan, walaupun DAP memperjuangkan ‘Malaysian Malaysia’, DAP juga menjadi ‘God-father’ kepada pendokong-pendokong SEKOLAH ALIRAN BAHASA CINA.

Aku kerap bertanya, apakah wajar sebuah parti politik seperti DAP, yang memperjuangkan matlamat-matlamat yang BERTENTANGAN dengan semangat dan kandungan Perlembagaan Persekutuan, dibenarkan bergerak sebagai sebuah pertubuhan berdaftar, malah dibenarkan bertanding di dalam PRU di Malaysia, dan mempengaruhi hala-tuju dan dasar-dasar negara Malaysia. Aku telah membuat kajian-kajian tentang Akta Pertubuhan 1966, dan telah mendapat sebahagian dari jawapan-jawapannya. Di antara yang menarik perhatian aku ialah Perkara 2A dengan tajuk: ‘PERTUBUHAN-PERTUBUHAN BERDAFTER HENDAKLAH BERGERAK MENGIKUT PERUNTUKAN PERLEMBAGAAN’.

Perkara 2A mencatatkan: ‘Adalah menjadi tanggung-jawab setiap pertubuhan berdaftar untuk menjalankan aktiviti-aktiviti dan urusan-urusannya, dengan menentukan bahawa aktiviti-aktiviti tersebut adalah bertepatan dengan, dan menyumbang ke arah memenuhi dan mematuhi, peruntukan-peruntukan Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan Perlembagaan Negeri-Negeri, dan jika terdapat apa-apa aktiviti atau urusan mana-mana pertubuhan yang melanggar, atau merendahkan, atau bertentangan dengan, atau tidak mempedulikan tentang…..kedudukan istimewa Melayu dan bumiputra Sabah dan Sarawak….sebagaimana diperuntukkan di dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan, Pendaftar Pertubuhan boleh MEMBATALKAN pendaftaran pertubuhan tersebut….’

Setelah mengkaji peruntukan-peruntukan di dalam Akta Pertubuhan 1966, aku mencapai suatu kesimpulan, bahawa terdapat beberapa parti-parti politik di negara ini, terutamanya DAP, yang telah begitu lama menjalankan kegiatan-kegiatan dan urusan-urusan yang boleh dianggap sebagai MELANGGAR, atau MERENDAHKAN, atau BERTENTANGAN DENGAN, atau TIDAK MEMPEDULIKAN, peruntukan-peruntukan Perlembagaan, khususnya berhubung HAK ISTIMEWA MELAYU/BUMIPUTRA. Keadaan ini telah dibiarkan berterusan sejak begitu lama sehingga telah bercambah dan berkembang POLITIK DENDAM DAN BENCI ke seluruh pelusuk negara.

Akta Pertubuhan 1966 amat jelas peruntukan-peruntukannya. Akta tersebut juga menetapkan SIAPAKAH YANG BERTANGGUNG-JAWAB untuk memantau segala kegiatan dan urusan pertubuhan-pertubuhan berdaftar, dan apakah tindakan-tindakan di bawah bidang kuasa mereka yang boleh dikuat-kuasakan, apabila ada pertubuhan-pertubuhan yang mana aspirasi, matlamat dan kegiatan mereka BERTENTANGAN dengan semangat dan kandungan Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

Aku amat berharap NGO-NGO Melayu, termasuk UMNO, dan bloggers yang pro-UMNO/BN supaya mengkaji perkara ini dengan lebih lanjut, supaya kita dapat mempastikan bahawa parti-parti politik yang beraspirasi, bermatlamat dan bertindak BERTENTANGAN dengan kandungan dan semangat Perlembagaan Persekutuan diBATALkan pendaftaran mereka, dan tidak dibenarkan untuk bertanding di dalam pilihanraya di negara ini.

Registration of DAP Can Be CANCELLED, According To Societies Acts 1966, For Advocating ‘Malaysian Malaysia’.

December 16, 2012

The concept of ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ was first advocated by the Singapore-based PAP, shortly after the formation of Malaysia. ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ envisaged a Malaysian society which would do away with SPECIAL POSITION OF MALAYS/BUMIPUTRAS as provided for in the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.

PAP’s obsession with ‘Malaysian Malaysia’  was bitterly opposed by UMNO, the backbone of the then ruling Alliance Party which consisted of UMNO, MCA and MIC. Eventually, this had resulted into the expulsion of Singapore from the Federation. It was seen by many as an act of ‘amputating’ certain cancerous part the body in order to keep the other parts of the body healthy.

However, the expulsion of Singapore did not stop ‘PAP’s ideology’ from being upheld in Malaysia by former supporters of PAP in Malaysia, who later formed the Democratic Actions Party(DAP), whose present leadership include Lim Kit Siang as its advicer, Lim Guan Eng as the Secretary General, and Karpal Singh as the Chairman. DAP’s debut in the 1969 General Election co-incided with the the most devastating racial riots the country had ever witnessed for decades.

DAP’s persistent advocacy of ‘Malaysian Malaysia’, which aims to remove policies favourable to the Malays/Bumiputras, as provided for in the Federal Constitution,  has been the MOST POTENT FLASHPOINT in Malaysian politics and race-relations in the country. Infact, Lim Kit Siang used to write a book entitled ‘THE TIME BOMB’ , forecasting an inter-racial ‘explosion’ along the path of our nation. Paradoxically, DAP has been the ‘God-father’  of Chinese educationists who have been upholding CHINESE-MEDIUM SCHOOLS.

I did wonder, whether, a political party like DAP, whose aspirations are IN CONTRADICTION to the spirit and letters of our Federal Constitution should be allowed to exist as a REGISTERED SOCIETY, what more about being allowed to take part in the political elections in the country. I’d looked for some answers in the Societies Acts 1966. Having browsed through back and forth, my attention was focused on the item 2A which was listed under a heading ‘REGISTERED SOCIETIES TO ACT IN FULFILLMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION’.

Item 2A started with: “It should be the duty of every registered society to carrying out its activities and conducting  its affairs, to ensure that they are in accord, and conducive to the fulfillment of and adherence to, the provisions of the Federal Constitution and the State Constitution, and where any of the activities or affairs of any society is in any manner violative of, or derogatory to, or militate against, or show disregard for……………………the position of the Malays and the natives of Sabah and Sarawak……as provided in the Federal Constitution, the Registrar may CANCEL the registration of the society…..”.

Having studied the provisions in the Societies Act 1966, I reached a FIRM CONCLUSION that many political parties in the country, notably the DAP, have been conducting their activities and affairs, in a manner VIOLATIVE OF, DEROGATORY TO, MILITATE AGAINST, and SHOW DISREGARD to the Federal Constitution, in particular, with regards to THE SPECIAL POSITION OF MALAYS/BUMIPUTRAS.  These have been the underlying factors WHY there have been so much POLITICS OF HATE been spread out to all corners of our country.

The Societies Act 1966 are very clear about it. And the Act clearly spelt out WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE to monitor the activities and affairs of registered societies, and what actions are within their powers to exercise, when certain societies conduct their activities and affairs IN CONTRADICTION to the spirit and letters of our Federal Constitution. I hope all pro-BN bloggers will take note and study this matter further, so that we can ensure that any political party who are acting against the letters and spirit of our Federal Constitution will get their registration CANCELLED, and not be allowed to dictate or determine the future of our GREAT NATION.

Registration of DAP Can Be Cancelled For Advocating MALAYSIAN MALAYSIA.

September 18, 2012

The concept of MALAYSIAN MALAYSIA was first advocated by the Singapore-based PAP, shortly after the formation of Malaysia. MALAYSIAN MALAYSIA envisaged a Malaysian society which would do away with SPECIAL POSITION OF MALAYS/BUMIPUTRAS as provided for in the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.

PAP’s obsession with MALAYSIAN MALAYSIA was bitterly opposed by UMNO, the backbone of the then ruling Alliance Party which consisted of UMNO, MCA and MIC. Eventually, this had resulted into the expulsion of Singapore from the Federation. It was seen by many as an act of ‘amputating’ certain cancerous part the body in order to keep the other parts of the body healthy.

However, the expulsion of Singapore did not stop ‘PAP’s ideology’ from being upheld in Malaysia by former supporters of PAP in Malaysia, who later formed the Democratic Actions Party(DAP), whose present leadership include Lim Kit Siang as its advicer, Lim Guan Eng as the Secretary General, and Karpal Singh as the Chairman. DAP’s debut in the 1969 General Election co-incided with the the most devastating racial riots the country had ever witnessed for decades.

DAP’s persistent advocacy of MALAYSIAN MALAYSIA, which aims to remove policies favourable to the Malays/Bumiputras,as provided for in the Federal Constitution,  has been the MOST POTENT FLASHPOINT in Malaysian politics and race-relations in the country. Infact, Lim Kit Siang used to write a book entitled ‘THE TIME BOMB’ , forecasting an inter-racial ‘explosion’ along the path of our nation. Paradoxically, DAP has been the ‘God-father’  of Chinese educationists who have been upholding CHINESE-MEDIUMED SCHOOLS.

I did wonder, whether, a political party like DAP, whose aspirations are IN CONTRADICTION to the spirit and letters of our Federal Constitution should be allowed to exist as a REGISTERED SOCIETY, what more about being allowed to take part in the political elections in the country. I’d looked for some answers in the Societies Acts 1966. Having browsed through back and forth, my attention was focused on the item 2A which was listed under a heading ‘REGISTERED SOCIETIES TO ACT IN FULFILLMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION’.

Item 2A started with: “It should be the duty of every registered society to carrying out its activities and conducting  its affairs, to ensure that they are in accord, and conducive to the fulfillment of and adherence to, the provisions of the Federal Constitution and the State Constitution, and where any of the activities or affairs of any society is in any manner vialative of, or derogatory to, or militate against, or show disregard for……………………the position of the Malays and the natives of Sabah and Sarawak……as provided in the Federal Constitution, the Registrar may CANCEL the registration of the society…..”.

Having studied the provisions in the Societies Act 1966, I reached a FIRM CONCLUSION that many political parties in the country, notably the DAP, have been conducting their activities and affairs, in a manner VIALATIVE OF, DEROGATORY TO, MILITATE AGAINST, and SHOW DISREGARD to the Federal Constitution, in particular, with regards to THE SPECIAL POSITION OF MALAYS/BUMIPUTRAS.  These have been the underlying factors WHY there have been so much POLITICS OF HATE been spread out to all corners of our country.

The Societies Act 1966 are very clear about it. And the Act clearly spelt out WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE to monitor the activities and affairs of registered societies, and what actions are within their powers to exercise, when certain societies conduct their activities and affairs IN CONTRADICTION to the spirit and letters of our Federal Constitution. I hope all pro-BN bloggers will take note and study this matter further, so that we can ensure that any political party who are acting against the letters and spirit of our Federal Constitution will get their registration CANCELLED, and not be allowed to dictate or determine the future of our GREAT NATION.


%d bloggers like this: